|
about
the site
the
author
titles
first
lines
essays
translations
acknowledgments
abraxas
press
|
Note
on
E and D
This
is the first of three related pieces.
I greatly admire Emily Dickinson and Dorothy Parker, though I
discovered Dorothy’s poetry, very popular in its day, only after
watching the movie Mrs Parker and the Vicious Circle.
The first two pieces are emulations, or loving pastiches if you
will, of each of the authors, and the third is a fusion of my feelings
about them and one of their themes.
An
emulation of someone else’s poem is related to what I’ve called the
essence of that text. Although I often use the word essence to mean the gist or
thrust, I also use it for the power or potential of a poem to give rise
to a mental state. If a
work exists in more than one copy and as different versions, with
perhaps a few or even many appraisals of it around, then all the copies,
versions and critiques cohere to form the essence.
This changes over time according to new insights and different
fashions in reading.
An
essence is therefore not totally accessible, being a dispersed medley.
An emulation of another’s oeuvre as a whole adds something to
the power of that whole, though the essence of an oeuvre is necessarily
a vaguer and more diffuse power than that of a single work.
More obviously, an emulated oeuvre bears down with silent
judgment upon the tribute. Borrowed
clothes disappoint if not worn with bravura.
(back to E and D)
Emily
Dickinson
This
uses Dickinson’s style to say something that’s closer to my own
beliefs than to hers. She
did indeed gently reprove the narrowness of some types of Puritan New
England minds of the 1860s, with their ‘horror so refined’ that they
were ashamed of God himself:
Such dimity convictions,
A horror so refined
Of freckled human nature,
Of deity ashamed.
But
she was sincerely affected by church hymns and Christian imagery; she
wondered in a happy, childlike manner at the splendour of life and the
mystery of death. She had
no doubts, for instance, about an afterlife.
About the grave she wrote:
Ample make this bed;
Make this bed with awe.
In it wait till judgment break
Excellent and fair.
The
expropriation of her language habits in the short piece above might read
like a satire of her peculiar inventiveness, but that was not the
intention. Intention did
not come into the writing, this is one of those pieces that practically
wrote itself. The following
explanations come after the event.
The words arrived, I could not reject them.
I can, however, try to defend them.
Blue is normally associated with serenity and peace.
In most of the paintings of the Virgin Mary her mantle is the
expensive ultramarine blue of the lapis lazuli pigment.
See Assumption paintings alone, by El Greco, Rubens, Poussin.
Attributing blue to Judas the betrayer might seem to the pious a
touch wicked, but that’s the very point.
After the shock might come the reflection that one interpretation
of the story is that Judas was divinely ordained to betray Christ: he
was doing a bitter duty. I
take a faith that’s ‘tantamount to trees’ to be solid, and a faith
that’s lopped (pollarded) to be deformed. If I had faith it would be informed by doubt, not hope.
I take ‘unsanguined’ to mean ‘made unhopeful’ by
the human condition.
(back to E and D)
Dorothy
Parker
Parker
(1893–1967, née Rothschild) was a true poet who chose not to write in
new-fangled ways. Her
volumes of poetry, Enough Rope (1926), Death and Taxes
(1931) and Not So Deep As A Well (1936), show her writing mostly
about love, its evanescence and deceptions, in a scratchy, sardonic and
very amusing way. Her
self-mocking style twists old-fashioned forms, with their allegorical
landscapes of riders, lilacs, Death and broken hearts, to service her
apparent longing for love in a sophisticated, catty world where one-
night stands with any ‘likely lad in town’ are, in many a life, the
norm. See for example Wail,
which contains the lines ‘All my pretty hates are dead, / And what
have I left?’
What
do I think I’ve achieved? I
look back and wonder. Just
as I was using the Dickinson mode to express my own doubt about whether
or not I had her sort of faith, perhaps here I’ve used the Parker mode
to express feelings, real or imagined, of emotional withholding.
More to the point, in these three pieces, is the music, imagery,
wit even, and the question as to whether poems done in the style of
others have any merit beyond competition pages and writing-class
exercises. I think they do,
and there’s probably a mass of amazingly good stuff out there which
would fill many astute anthologies.
This one plays an interesting game with auxiliary verbs, you may
notice. Art may be a
side-door into and out of the world, but it’s also a game, remember,
like this sentence.
(back to E and D)
Dorothy’s
Emily-Song
This
is in the Dorothy Parker mode on behalf of Emily, whose lonely love for
the married Rev. Charles Wadsworth got her to see herself as ‘The
Queen of Calvary’ when he was appointed to the Calvary Church in San
Francisco in 1862. She wrote:
I
could not bear the bees should come;
I
wished they’d stay away
In
those dim countries where they go.
What
word had they for me?
They’re
here though; not a creature failed.
No
blossom stayed away
In
gentle deference to me,
The
Queen of Calvary,
Each
one salutes me as he goes,
And
I my childish plumes
Lift,
in bereaved acknowledgement
Of
their unthinking drums.
Notes
by Alan Marshfield
top
of page
E and D |